National Sponsors
November 2, 2011 Indian Valley Record | ![]() |
©
Indian Valley Record. All rights reserved. Upgrade to access Premium Tools
PAGE 12 (12 of 32 available) PREVIOUS NEXT Jumbo Image Save To Scrapbook Set Notifiers PDF JPG
November 2, 2011 |
|
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader ![]() |
4B Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2011
Bulletin, Progressive, Record, Reporter
" , " 0000isis
Leg(,:l s take ()n the hc)usirzg
LEGAL MUSINGS
STEVE BRENNEMAN
steve@school pathways• co m
By now, we've all heard the
term housing crisis, aka
mortgage crisis, aka foreclo-
sure crisis, more times than
we'd care to count. The terms
appear to encompass a host of
problems and circumstances.
If you are one of those people
who, through no fault of your
own, became unable to make
your mortgage payment and
lost your home to foreclo-
sure, my sympathy goes out
to you.
A home is often so much
more than just a roof over
your head and a place to come
in from the cold. It is a base of
operation and an anchor in
a stormy sea. Home is the
sanctuary to which one may
escape and from which one
may exclude all others. A
man's home is his castle.
Trite, but nevertheless true.
So while "crisis" may seem
a bit over the top in describ-
ing the current situation, it is
indeed a•crisis to those forced
to give up their homds and
either downsize or, in the
extreme case, begin living
out of their cars. What must
it be like to have to tell your
children they're moving from
the only home they've ever
known to a shelter?
There is plenty of blame to
go around for the current
mess. From investment
bankers who ignored the
reality of weak loans and
peddled them to investors as
solid gold, to politicians who
turned a blind eye to mount-
ing evidence of a looming
collapse, one hardly knows
where to begin.
But let's not overlook the
homeowners themselves.
There were those who bought
much more home than they
could realistically afford with
little or nothing down. There
were also homeowners Who
kept borrowing on rising
home values to bankroll
lifestyles far beyond their
means. Clearly, many of the
foreclosure wounds were self-
inflicted. Of course, that does
not make them any less
painful.
Inevitably, a situation such
as this spawns all manner of
lawsuits intended to deflect
blame and recoup losses.
One case I recall reading about
awhile back involved an elder-
ly woman whose husband had
died and she found he,elf no
longer able to pay the mort-
gage on the home where she
had lived for many years.
At the time, the woman
owed probably half of what
the home was worth. Over
the next few years, she refi-
nanced the mortgage several
times, each time increasing
the size of the loan and
taking cash out to help make
future mortgage payments.
Eventually, the size of the
mortgage exceeded the value
of the home and she could no
longer obtain refinancing.
Nor could she make the ever-
increasing mortgage pay-
ments. The lender foreclosed
and the woman was forced to
move out.
She sued the various
lenders on a theory of preda-
tory lending practices. She
alleged the lenders knew she
could not make the increas-
ing mortgage payments but
allowed her to refinance any-
way in order to eventually
take away her home.
Of course, one can readily
see the holes in such a claim.
Each lender except the last
received nothing more out
of the deal than the return
of their investment plus
interest, which interest the
woman was already paying
on her original mortgage. The
refmancing merely replaced
one lender with another.
As for the final lender, since
the value of the home was legs
than the mortgage amount,
the house would have sold in
foreclosure for less than the
loan amountl thereby causing
that lender to lose money on
the deal. (The real villain here
appeared to have been the
mortgage brokers, who
charged hefty fees to arrange
for the various refinances
that never should have
occurred.)
The other day, I read about
a case that is certainly one of
the most imaginative I have
seen in assessing blame for
the mortgage crisis. In Maya
v. Centex Corporation, the
plaintiffs are homeowners
who have notlost their homes
to foreclosure. Nevertheless,
they claim fraudulent prac-
tices by various home builders
and developers in selling
homes topeople who were
not as creditworthy as the
plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs' theory goes
like this: They are good risks
who bought homes in new
developments that were well
within their financial means.
At the time, the defendants
advertised that they were
building "stable, family neigh-
borhoods occupied by owners
of the homes." However, soon
thereafter, the defendants
began marketing their homes
to "unqualified buyers who
posed an abnormally high
risk of foreclosure" and spec-
ulators who had no intention
of OCCUpying the homes.
Later, when the housing
bubble burst, the defendants'
selling practices resulted in
abnormally high rates of
foreclosures in the neighbor-
hoods where the plaintiffs
lived. This, in turn, resulted
in decreases in the values of
the plaintiffs' homes.
The plaintiffs also alleged
they paid more for their
houses than they were worth
because of the defendants'
misrepresentations about the
nature of the neighborhoods
being developed.
Sometimes, I am truly
humbled by the ingenuity of
my brethren in the legal
profession.
However, the federal dis-
trict court was having none
of it and dismissed the case.
The court concluded the
because none of them had
sold or attempted to sell their
homes. Hence, any losses
due to decreased value were
"conjectural."
This is sortoflike saying
that after an accident in which
your car sustains substantial
damage you cannot pursue a
claim against the party who
rear-ended you because you
haven't tried to sell the car yet.
The district court also
concluded any possible over-
payment for the homes by the
plaintiffs was speculative and
activities, in light of the
overall market decline.
The Ninth Circuit rever
disagreeing with the distr.
court on all points, and se:
the case back to the distri,
court for trial.
This case, of course, is r
emblematic of the housin{
crisis, since the plaintiffs
not lose their homes, only
some of the homes' value.
it demonstrates the breadl
of the problem. The federa
government may ultimate
get involved in aneffort t(
;ed,
ct
It
t
ot
lid
But
h
Ly
plaintiffs did not have stand- any claimed losses could not limit the damage. God help us
ing to pursue such a claim be traced to the defendants' all. /
Fire chiefs host workshop
The Plumas County Fire
Chiefs Association will host a
fire district leadership work-
shop Nov. 19, from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m. at the Graeagle Fire Pro-
tection District.
This workshop is designed to
orient, educate and support
fire district boards and staff
who comprise fwe department
leadership teams.
The workshop is open to
board members, fwe chiefs, ad-
ministrative staff and anyone
involved with fee district gov-
ernance. The cost is $25 per per-
son, payable to Plumas County
Fire Chiefs Association.
RSVP to Tom Forster,
tnforster@mac.com or 836-
1086, by Nov. 11.
Legal foundation topics to
be covered include: special
district governance; fire
protection district law; conflict
of interest and ethics laws;
public records law; Local
Agency Formation Commis-
sion law and procedures;
understanding federal, state
and local responsibility areas;
resources for fee departments;
planning for cooperative, re-
gional efforts; and the Plumas
County Fire Chiefs Associa-
tion strategic plan.
Fire district governance
topics to be covered include:
principles of board gover-
nance; board dynamics; board
roles and responsibilities; staff
roles and responsibilities; fire
chief personnel evaluation;
perceptions of organizational
success; and board meetings,
open meeting law.
Instructor Jim Hill has
conducted workshops on
special district laws as
as board governance
dynamics throughout the sl
He is a past president of
Fire Districts Associatio
California and the Sane
County Fire Districts Assc
tion.
Hill has been a board m
bar with the Cloverdale
Protection District for the
seveh years, and prior to
served 11 years on the bo
the Forestville Fire Protec
District. He was on the st
ing committee that fori
REDCOM, a fire/EMS disp:
joint powers authority
Sonoma County, and serve
its f'wst board chair. He wa
so involved with the deve
ment of a fwe district admi
tration handbook and ha
years offwe service experie
BBB warns c MeqJicare scare
Medicare open enrollment
started recently and already
scammers are capitalizing on
the period with a phone scam
aimed at obtaining senior
citizens' banking information.
The Better Business Bureau
(BBB) serving Northeast Cali-
fornia is urging consumers to
beware of phone calls claim-
ing to be from Medicare offer-
ing new cards.
Consumers should never
give out personal informa-
tion over the telephone.
Medicare does not make
telephone calls regarding
health care coverage. Should
consumers have questi
about coverage, they can
Medicare's toll-free ]
at (800) MEDICARE (1
633-4227).
If you have questi
regarding the authenticit
a call, Call the BBB at (!
443-6843.
ell
md
ate.
the
1 of
ma
cia-
am-
'ire
)ast
:hat
dof
:ion
eer-
:led
ttch
in
1 as
;al-
Lop-
his-
40
:Ice.
IS
ns
call
ine
lO0-
2ns
of
6p
3
4
6
5
3
2
5
7 1
2
4
8 9
6
3
3
Difficult
2
I
4
9
1 6 ¸
5
7
kg Your Nose In elcthl
I.I,IGEENIolelEILIsEEA c
IAIIAIMIulLIITM ol
I'IsIINIAINIoIsIEIcloI.!
lulNIoI.III.IolsIIolKo
I.IILlemoI.IEI,ILILmA
IlelelNlBslYIol.lelYmmy
Sudoku Solution #2331-D
91.62873
74851 32
5236497
8924651
6 7 1 9 32 4
3 5 4 1 78 6
1 8 7 3945
2 3 9 7 5168
4 6 5 8 2il
541
g 61
181
i
7 •3 I
851
2 91
I
621
4 1
371
|
ACROSS
1. Donaldson or
Spade
4. "The _ knees"
(great)
8. Half the "Who's
on First?" team
14. indian, Brave or
Chief
15. Green feeling?
16. Signals from a
downed flier,
perhaps
17. Conquistador's
treasure
18. Former Fed head
Greenspan
19. Building, after
demolition
20. They're checked
23. Turns inside out
24. Relative of-esque
25. Slacker's bane
28. Fiddler of legend
29. Offer lessons
32. Pouting
expression
33. Chat room
patrons
35. First Lady after
Hillary
36. They're checked
40. _-washy
41. Makes tolerable
42. To boot
43. Belarus's capital
45. Ump's call
49. Day_ colors
50. Give the boot to
51. Like most runs, in
baseball
53. They're checked
56. Play merrily
59. Not even fair
60. Actor Billy__
Williams
61. Bird on a baseball
cap
62. Partner of tried
63. Cyberspace
initials
64. Sweet drink
Check It Out
IS
i8
21
m
33 4
B7
;0
53
7 158
m m
American Profile Hometown Contenl
65. Srs.' exams
66. Sr., et al.
DOWN
1. Word w th we - or
soft-
2. Make it big
3. Sentimental sort
4. Beauty's beloved
5. Any military
recruit, these
days
6. Indiana's Bayh
7. In
(harmonious)
8. From square one
9. Show
embarrassment
10. Streisand, in
fanzines
11. Heavenly body
12. __ Aviv
13. 'ffhe Waste Land"
initials
) 0
16
19
!2
!4 .S
,2
S
8 9 i
I
51 i2
i5
21. Mustachioed
Marx
22. Tosspot's
utterance
25. Soup du __
26. Sharer's word
27. Arthur or
Benaderet
30. Suffix with mock
or crock
31. Colorado ski spot
32. Baton wielder
34.Shade of blue
35. Strong alkali
36. Bunker or Nob
37. __ buco
38. Palmas,
Canary Islands
39. Invited to dinner,
perhaps
40. Tongue or tail
action
43. Space occupier
I1
m
0
53
6
10/23/2011
44. Helpful
connections
46. How Rome wasn't
built?
47, Shower item?
48. Ford flops
50. Rhea's "Cheers"
role
52. Farm measures
53. Catcall
54. Many NYC
dwellings
55. One of Asta's
masters
56. One in the clink
57. Live and breathe
58. Old _ (London
theater)
Champagne Opening!
GOOD VIBRATIONS
278 Main St., Chester • Sat., Nov. 19th • 1 pm-4pm
"Doing the Dance on Deer Creek"
Pam@TrebesStudios.com
3215 Hill Crest Drive
Lake Almanor, California 96137
530-596,4166
www.TrebesStudios..com
Installing
Audio /Video Equipment
Since 1958
Rick@TrebesStudios.com
}
i:, F ! , r I ' " " :' 'i _ I ]
l.WIT ! , I !I: ,t- o.,,,J I I ,!I l!tt! lIE !i': !!1!-_.-[I llll ]I l.f,, l[Ii lB. [[1[ 111:1 II ! l,l,.lllL [I JilllBilli imiilil