Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Indian Valley Record
Greenville, California
October 26, 2011     Indian Valley Record
PAGE 1     (1 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 1     (1 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
October 26, 2011
 
Newspaper Archive of Indian Valley Record produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




Vol. 81, No. 49 ° Feather Publishing Co.i Inc. * I I H6 them apples ? Greenville High School student A.J. Courtright climbs to reach apples the deer can't get in his quest to learn business skills as part of the Indian Valley Apple Corps. For the story and more photos, see page 15B. Photo by Alicia Knadler 530-284-/8UU ,ww.plumaslVevs.com • Ill of the Indian Valley Area iwesday, Oct. 26, 2011 I 5O¢ County's negotiations end in employee furloughs BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROUNDUP unions have complained about the sheriff's office being exempt. That is report- edly a major issue : the stalled negotiations, i,!i' "Most of the memers I have talked to feel it is unfair to have the OE3 (Operating Engineers Local 3) members contribute 4 percent toward PERS (retirement fund) and not require the same from others, such as the sheriff's unit and classified depart- ment heads," said Barbara Palmerton, who is a member of the union negotiating team. "The sheriffs have the best, most expensive retire- ment of any of us. But they aren't being asked to contribute anything at all." In exchange for retirement cuts, the board accepted a $250,000 general fund contri- bution from the sheriff's office for the 2011-12 budget. The supervisors said the sheriff's office likely would be exempt from cuts for this year only. The supervisors did agree to furlough flexibility so that vital county services would not be drastically affected. One of the services the board considered vital is feeding needy senior citizens. Martha Hoot=el. =o- of Plumas Senior Nutrition, stressed the importance of that service. She said her staff is "bare bones" right now. And furloughs could mean some seniors might not get a nutri- tional meal for three straight days. The supervisors unani- mously agreed to help main- tain that service. "We have senior citizens where this is probably their only hot meal that a lot of them have each day," SuPervisor Terry Swofford said. ,'There are home-bound people who depend on these meals. And then there's also people who ride the bus who depend on these meals." All of the supervisors weighed in to show their support for the program. "If anyone in here wants to disagree that that's not a priority of government, let's put on the boxing gloves," Supervisor Jon Kennedy said. "Because I'll go there with that one." Public Health Director Mimi Hall assured the super- visors her department would "do our best to figure it out." However, some county de- partments could be closed for a day during some weeks. Offices that remain open See Roundup, page4A Dan McDonald Staff Writer d mcdonald@plumasnews.com With union negotiations at an impasse, financially struggling Plumas County has decided to furlough its employees. At its meeting Tuesday, Oct. 18, the county's Board of Supervisors voted unani- mously to adopt furloughs for all county employees, with the exception of those in the sheriff's office. The board directed county workers to each take off four days without pay by Feb. 29, 2012. The furloughs are limited to a maximum of one day per two-week pay period. The supervisors decided furloughs were necessary for at least two reasons. First, the employee unions have not voted to accept the county's 4 percent cut to retirement contributions, passed as part of the fiscal 2011-12 budget cuts. And county revenue con- tinues to decline. County Budget Officer Jack Ingstad told the board "our revenues continue to show problems. Sales tax is down. We don't expect property tax to im- prove. And we are not getting some of the cost savings we had hoped." The county planned to save about $200,000 by reducing its contribution to the retire- ment fund. However, the affected SupervisorS tackle mandated curb recycling Dan McDonald Staff Writer dmcdonald@plumasnews.com On Tuesday, Oct. 18, the Plumas County Board of Supervisors tackled the problem for more than an hour. The supervisors plan to address the issue again Nov. 8. "We've had a state mandate since 1990 requirin us to divert solid waste by a cer- tain percentage," Supervisor Jon Kennedy said. "They are mandating all countms and cities and jurisdictions with- in the state of California to do this. This is something we have to do. We can't just say no." With that thought in mind, the supervisors discussed the issue with Waste Manage- ment General Manager Greg Martinelli. Waste Manage- ment does business as Feather River Disposal in Plumas County. Feather River Disposal (FRD), which made a 17 per- cent profit in 2010, said it is willing to use some of that money to help offset the cost of curbside recycling. However, Martinelli's pro- posal would still require a rate increase for FRD customers. The supervisors said they want to avoid an increase if at all possible. Martinelli told the board it would cost his company an extra $11.54 monthly per customer to do curbside recycling. He said FRD would contribute $2.79 toward the cost, leaving a monthly increase of $9.18 for each of its 2,874 customers. That number does not include FRD customers in Chester, Quincy and La Porte. Chester and Quincy have separate recycling programs with FRD. Martinelli's recommenda- tion is to standardize the service. He said each cus- tomer would have a 64-gallon green garbage cart and a 64- gallon blue recycling cart. The garbage would contin- ue to be hauled away every week. The recycling would be picked up every other week. See Curbside, page 4A Plumas County is facing a mandate from the state to institute recycling. The county needs to have 75 percent compliance by 2020. The challenge is to make the service available and affordable at the same time. BCS pursues AB 900 grant for jail construction Dan McDonald Staff Writer dmcdonald@plumasnews.com The sheriff said the county could be eligible for state grant funding under AB 900 Phase II. The grant would require a 5 percent match from counties that are awarded the money. The match re- quirement is down from 25 percent last year, Thirty small counties are competing for a share of $100 million available through the Corrections Standards AuthOrity. But Hagwood warned that the application process is daunting. And if Plumas County is selected, it will have to come up with the $1 million at that time. Like many rural counties, Plumas has been forced to makp budget cuts that in- clude layoffs and furloughs for employees. Finding $1 million won't be easy. "It's an incredibly great deal at an incredibly poor time," Supervisor Lori Simp- son said. "We are spending our reserves." Despite the financial obstacle, the board voted unanimously to apply for the grant. The application process be- gan with a letter of interest that had to be delivered to the Corrections Standards Authority by Friday, Oct. 21. The interest statement merely puts the county in the running. If the Corrections Standards Authority accepts the interest letter, the county will be invited to submit a formal application. "It's an incredibly labor- intensive project, putting the application together, the needs assessment. It's a phenomenal body of work," Hagwood said. "It's some- thing we are prepared to engage. But there are those conditions'that I set forward, that I would like the board to be cognizant of if we are going to pursue this." The $1 million condition is the big one. See Jails, page 4A It might be considered a long shot, but Plumas County could get a new state-of- the-art $20 million jail for $1 million. Sheriff Greg Hagwood out- lined the possibility for the Board of Supervisors during a meeting Tuesday, Oct. 18. Wt atever happened to ... the Eaglesmith lawsuit? Delaine Fragnoli Managing Editor dfragnoli@plumasnews.com Background: Eight months ago J.C. Eaglesmith, a teacher at the Plumas County Community School and former Quincy High School basketball coach, filed suit in federal court against Plumas Unified School District (PUSD) and Plumas County Office of Education (PCOE) To subscribe to the Record, call 530-283-0800 and a number of administra- tors alleging he was discrimi- nated against, harassed and retaliated against bdcause of his race, national origin and exercise of First Amendment and other protected rights. Eaglesmith was joined in the suit by his wife, Ramona Eaglesmith; son Justus Eaglesmith; and Quincy High School (QHS) staff members Eileen Cox and Bruce Barnes. The latest: Earlier this month, judge John A. Mendez of the U.S. District Court Eastern District of California made his first significant ruling in the case, finding largely in favor of the plain- tiffs. The district argued, in motions to dismiss and to strike, that the various plain- tiffs did not have legitimate or sufficient claims under the pertinent laws. Mendez found that they mostly did, with the exception of Eaglesmith's wife, Ramona. Mendez did note several times in his order that the •law requires him to err on the side of the plaintiffs at this point in the proceedings. What's next: Plaintiffs are due to file a revised com- plaint, taking into'considera - tion the court's ruling. Related events: Plaintiff Cox appeared before the school board in August to read a lengthy list of what See Lawsuit, page 4A Royalty reigns victorious Greenville High School homecoming court members Queen Breaunna Tolen, King Andres Herrera, Prince Brandon Meza and • Princess Jackie Dery reign victorious over an entertaining, action-packed game students played on a whim, when the Opposing team forfeited and did not show up. For more photos, see page 6A. Photo by Alicia Knadler