Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Indian Valley Record
Greenville, California
October 5, 2011     Indian Valley Record
PAGE 1     (1 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 1     (1 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
October 5, 2011
 
Newspaper Archive of Indian Valley Record produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




e Vol. 81, No. 46 * Feather Publishing Co., Inc. ° 530-284-7800 tl Serving Greenville and all of the Indian Valley Area • www.plumasnews.com • Wednesday, Oct. 5, 2011 Ii Dan McDonald Staff Writer dmcdonald@plumasnews.com Ready or not ... here they come. On Saturday, Oct. 1, the criminal justice system in California began one of the most drastic and contro- versial overhauls in recent history. As a result of Assembly Bill 109, many felons deemed "nonviolent" will be serving their prison sentences in county jails instead of state prisons. For cash-strapped rural counties like Plumas, the added burden could be staggering. Over the past several months, the county has been trying to scrape together enough money and additional manpower to deal with the expected influx of prisoners and parolees. The sheriff predicts the jail will fill up quickly. The chief probation officer is scrambling to hire extra staff. The understaffed district Mona Hill Staff Writer mhiil@plumasnews.com Feather Publishing re- ceived a letter dated Sept. 14 containing responses to the 2011 grand jury's report on Plumas County Office of Edu- cation and Plumas Unified School District. Enclosures included an Aug. 25 letter to Judge Janet Hilde from Glenn Harris, superintendent for PCOE and PUSD, and an undated document entitled "Plumas Unified School District Gov- erning Board Response to the Plumas County Grand Jury Report." The 2010-11 Plumas County grand jury devoted the bulk of its report to findings and attorneys of Yzce could face the awkward :position of having to decide which criminals should go to jail. The county's •health care: system could end up taking care of more inmates with mental health and substance abuse problems. "The criminal justice system as we know it is undergoing some of the most significant and radical changes in our lifetimes," District Attorney David HoUister said. Holltster and Sheriff Greg Hagwood have been canvassing the county in a series of townhall meetings to inform residents of the changes, and ask for their help at the same time. Hollister conducted the most recent townhall meet- ing Wednesday, Sept. 28, in Quincy. HoUister and Hagwood are also members of the Plumas County Community Correc- tions Partnership Executive Committee, tasked with form- ing a plan to deal with the inmate surge. The executive committee amine recommendations for the Plumas County Board of Education and PUSD. The civil panel reviews county entities to ensure accountability or in response to citizens' complaints. District's financial reserves The grand jury reviewed the district's 45 percent tar- get for its financial reserves and concluded the district faces uncertain financial times. Given the current situ- ation, the report's conclusion states, "signs point to main- taining the current budget courses." School board's response: "The Board appreciates that the grand jury recognized the importance of the reserve and the difficult financial "The criminal justice system as we know it is undergoing some of the most significant and radical changes in our lifetimes." David I-Iollister District Attorney includes Superior Court Judge Ira Kaufman, Public Defender Doug Prouty, Al- cohol and Drug Programs Administrator Mimi Hall and Chief Probation Officer Sharon Reinert, who chairs the committee. The committee has been working on an action plan that will go to the Board of Supervisors Oct. 18. To help cushion the financial blow, the super- visors have pledged to transfer $1 million from the county's Mental Health fund reserves for inmate-related mental health costs• That's because the state is giving Plumas County just over $200,000 to pay for the inmate realignment. Many county leaders agree the eventual costs will be much higher. The implications for Plumas County may not be fully realized for years. Following are som high- lights and statistics from the implementation plan compiled by the Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee: History of AB 109 Between 1973 and 2009 the nation's prison population grew by 705 percent. In California, the state prisons were operating at nan , issues facin~cthe District." Superim dent's response: Harris' letter agreed with the grand jury's conclusion. Harris expanded on his response, citing continued re- ductions for county offices of education throughout the state and monitoring for all local education areas within its j urisdiction, His letter added that PUSD has developed a strategic plan that sets specific goals for its reserves. He wrote, "We find this action extremely responsible and thoughtful on the part of district adminis- tration and the governing board. The use of an outside statewide specialist three years ago to conduct an extensive fiscal health re- view of both agencies was a Ision, wise decision." Harris warned of deficit spending beginning in 2011-12 that will accelerate in 2012-13 and quickly deplete reserves if school trustees take no actions "in the areas of personnel, facilities, trans- portation, and programs." District expulsion and suspension policies The grand jury's report found "school officials did not have a full understanding of the procedures or the purpose of the 'Zero Tolerance' ruling." It also found district action did not comply with code guidelines and time frames. School board's response: "The Board agrees that it needs to improve how it handles expulsions and suspensions in more than 170 percent of ca- pacity. And with a recidivism rate of 70 percent, the prisons were bursting at the seams. In 2009, a panel of three federal judges ordered Cali- fornia to reduce its prison population to 110,000 from 156,000. The official state prison capacity is 80,000. In May, the Supreme Court upheld the federal ruling. The court ruled for the state to reduce its prison population to 137.5 percent of capacity by May 24, 2013. The result was AB 109. Elements of AB 109 Redefining felonies: The definition is revised to in- clude certain crimes that are punishable by 16 months, two years or three years in jail. Serious, violent and sex offenses will continue to be served in state prisons. How- ever, some offenders will be put on probation rather than parole supervismn after being released from prison. Local post-release commu- nity supervision: Many felons released from state prisons beginning Oct. 1 will m general. Expulsion is one of the most serious things we do as a Board." The trustees further pledged to review their com- munication of the expulsion and suspension process, to make policies accessible online and to be proactive in informing district employees of revised policies. Superintendent's response: "While our appropriate county programs are re- quired by law to take in students from LEA's (sic) that have been expelled for the duration of their expul- sion, I have found no misuse of the expulsion practice by PUSD regarding the students we have received over the past three years." Harris noted that expulsion be subject tO community supervision by an agency approved by the Board of Supervisors• The county's understaffed probation de- partment-is expected to fill that role. Revocations heard and served locally: People who violate probation or parole will serve time in the county jail (up to 180 days)• Changes to custody credits: Inmates will now be able to earn four days of credit for every two days served. Time spent in home detention is credited as time spent in jail. As a result, inmates could serve just half their sentence in actual custody. Alternative custody: Eligible inmates will be placed on electronic monitor- ing instead of spending time in jail in lieu of bail. Target population: Inmates released from state prison to community supervision will be the responsibility of the county probation depart- ment. These felons can have serious or violent offenses in See Transfer, page 7A :ole is not permanent in most cases.: ~- "'~ Students fror~¢other LEAs (local education agencies) often have behavioral con- tracts and are allowed to return to their home LEA after a semester or two of demonstrated improvement in another educational setting. School safety policy reform Grand jurors concluded, given the procedural im- provements in place as of Dec. 10, 2010, that school officials had acted to improve school safety. School board's response: The board agreed and cited PUSD participation in Incident Command Team See Jury, page 7A Directors of the Indian Valley Health Care District are now accepting bids on the old hospital and the billing office properties. They have a website up at indianvalleyhospital.com, which includes full access to the grant- funded hospital reuse study and the invitation to bid. There are also photographs of the properties. The deadline for bids is noon Friday, Nov. 18. The minimum bid accept- able will be $475,000, and any bids may be rejected at board discretion. Mail bids to the Indian Val- ley Health Care District at 184 Hot Springs Road, Greenville, CA 95947, or faxed to 284-6573. For more information, call the district chairman, Guy McNett, at 284-6526. To subscribe to the Record, call 530-283-0800 • Greenville High School freshmen and sophomores enjoy the Extreme Entrepreneurship Tour Sept. 29. Especially fun was moderator E.J. Carrion, pictured with them, who is a motivational speaker, author and aspiring rapper who is on a journey to help students succeed in a tough economy. Photo by Laurie Wann