Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Indian Valley Record
Greenville, California
September 28, 2011     Indian Valley Record
PAGE 5     (5 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 5     (5 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
September 28, 2011
 
Newspaper Archive of Indian Valley Record produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




Indian Valley Record " Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2011 5A Water: Valley residents' frustration grows from page 1A office of Keith Mahan, Plumas County agricultural commissioner. People have had since 2004 to figure out an alternative, yet the state kept funding the program temporarily -- until now. Anderson explained this to supervisors before that meet- ing in Taylorsville, and he told them how letters were sent out to the water users after the governor's 2004 decision to stop funding support of the water- master service program. "There was a large outcry from the water users," he said. "The Farm Bureau, legislators, various people got involved." That is why the temporary funding was restored, to give them time to find other alter- natives. "There are other areas that have decided to have other entities provide watermaster service," Anderson said. "And that's allowed by the California water code." If there are other ways to provide a watermaster service, and people want to move forward, Anderson's staff members will be able to help do that, he added. Brian Morris, general man- ager of the Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, ex- plained one such alternative. He has been working with water rights holders and super- visors of both P!umas and Sierra counties, and fornally proposed they form a joint powers agreement. "So why would we wish to step into a position of once again inserting another layer of government into the picture?" Supervisor Sherrie Thrall wondered. "Why couldn't the water users form their own district without the county involvement?" Morris said they could, and that would probably be a better solution, but the time element was a problem -- it would take at least two years. "We've tried to do every- thing we can within a joint powers agreement to make it financially self-supporting and indemnify the counties," Morris added. Besides forming their own district, water users could also use an existing public agency as their watermaster, Morris explained. Later in Taylorsville, water users liked both options, a joint powers agreement and using a public entity, which they chose as the agricultural commissioner, since much of the equipment needed is already available. The startup and overhead costs, they figured, would be minimal. Morris hopes to have some- thing in place before the county must turn over the watermaster fees to the state Jan. 1. Anderson explained that in Lassen, when they took Over their own watermaster program, the money that was owed to his department was taken out of those fees, and the rest ,was retained to help with the startup costs. In Siskiyou, the county loaned the new water district $25,000 for startup. "If you can find a way to do it cheaper, I would have done that yesterday," Anderson told the crowd in Taylorsville. Can rancffers just do their own watermastering? This question was posed on District 2 Supervisor Robert Meacher's porch in Genesee by a couple of ranchers, and in the board meeting room by Harry Rogers, of the Key Brand Ranch. "That would have to be petitioned to the judge," Anderson said. They would need to explain why the program is not needed anymore. "It was created for a reason, and you would have ; to say why that is no longer the case," he said- and later on the phone said no one really knew any longer what those original reasons were. Supervisors agreed to the joint powers concept in a 3-2 vote. Meanwhile; Andrea Oilar from the agricultural com- missioner's office is helping study the issue to see if they will be able to help, as agreed to without opposition by the ayes of gathered ranchers. Editor's Note: Staff Writer Dan McDonald contributed information from the Plumas County Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, Sept. 20. Watermaster history in Indian Valley Alicia Knadler Indian Valley Editor aknadler@plumasnews.com Indian Creek Decree Superior Court Judge Ben V. Curler finalized, adjudicated and decreed the Indian Creek system water rights in Decem- ber 1950, with an amendment in 2004 to add a movable diversion point on the main creek at the request of peti- tioner Gonzalo Gonzales to benefit parcels 008-160'-23 and 008-160-24. Five petitioners, including water rights holders F.H. Dill, D.R. Strong, J.E. Cardoza, W.A. Snyder and Arthur Peter, initiated this decree process. After the state investiga- tion, water resources person- nel decided the public interest would be served by the adjudicated decree the five petitioners had asked for. There followed more state investigations and studies of the streams and diversions, and all the legal notices, proofs and time for objections required by law for such pro- ceedings -- all paid for by some, but not all of the water right holders. A list at the end of the court documents showed that the state had underestimated the costs entailed in this process and apportioned out the re- mainder, which was divided up between 25 of the rights holders, mainly ranchers at the time, the most being charged to the owners of what is now known as the Heart K Ranch. Watermaster service areas California Water Code Part 4, Chapter 2, requires the state to be divided into water- master service areas. On the state water website, the claim is that watermaster service areas are created by the Water Resources Depart- ment either at the request of water users or by order of the Superior Court. Proof of why the Indian Creek Watermaster Service Area was created is missing, though, according to North- ern Region Water Manage- ment Branch Chief Bill Mendenhall. If they do still have those old records, they are buried somewhere in a tunnel, or archived in a location unknown to him. The local watermaster service area was created by order of a state engineer in the public worksdepartment, A.D. Edmonston, who did not include in his order any history of requests by users or judges. He claimed the most practi- cal and economical super- vision of the distribution of water on the part of the state would best be accomplished ' by the creation of the water.- master service area. Edmonston also included in his order which water rights holders would be included in the service area, and which would not. This too is provided for in the code: The state may also enlarge, reduce, consolidate or abolish the areas "as conve- nience of administration may require." Excluded from the water- master service area at the time were those with rights to the mineshaft water in Crescent Mills, Bidwell Water Company, several ranchers and others. Then in 1959, officials ex- cluded rights holders in the upper reaches, because eight years of experience had proven the need for such service no longer existed. This decision seems con- trary, though, for in the watermaster report that year, it claims the Clover Valley Need help REPI NG If it's ng we can'll find someBmqmmo can, €ONSTRUCTION BINCE 1984 mm,,mmm General BuiMing Contractor Calif. Lic. #453927 (530) 283-2035 Richard K. Stockton, CLU ChFC, Agent Insurance Lic. #0868653 Providing Insurance & Financial Services 65 W. Main St., Quincy, CA 95971 (530) 283-0565 * Fax (530) 283-5143 www.richardstockton.us WE LIVE WHERE YOU LIVE Look no further. Having one special person for your car, home and life • insurance lets you get down to business with the rest of your life. It's what I do. GET TO A BETTER STATE'. CALL ME TODAY. 00StateFarm "s Criflee -T" First Annual Scarecrow Building Contest loin Avonna and friends at her new location, 3450 Hwy 147 for a Scarecrow Building contest. Entries will be limited to IS contestants with CASH PRIZES and a whole lot of fun, For more information and contest rules, please contact Monna at critterclippers@gmail.com system required regulation; that by July there was about 80 percent of the allotments, and that the supply from then through the rest of the season remained "fairly constant." Upper reach water users were in much better shape than those inthe lower reaches. According to the report, a subnormal snow pack com- bined with unseasonably warm and dry weather created "one of the poorest water supply years since the water- master service was initiated." There were no extraordi- nary notes to follow for Indian Creek, just that this irrigation season followed practices of past seasons and that the automatic water stage recorders were operated by the state water personnel. There were notes on Wolf Creek, though, that by the end of July no water was available for third priority rights holders, and that seconds were receiving only about half of their allotments, while a pump installed in 1958 continued to be operated , for use on the Posch and Frederickson ranches. And the flow of Williams Creek was only able to pro- vide stock water to the Dodge Ranch. On Lights Creek that year, water did not reach the De- Fanti Ranch'by the end of July, though stock water in the lower ditch on the Peter Ranch was maintained throughout the season. There was also an issue with the Mill Race that year, though when users fixed a leaky gate, it was somewhat resolved. It is interesting to note that exactly the same report for this diversion is given again in 1960. Last Chance Creek experi- enced problems as early as the beginning of April, and in June rotation was stopped even for first priority users. The lack of problems in some areas during 1959 was attributed to a large carryover of stored water where there were reservoirs. There was another amend- ment to the service areas in 1960, this time with an expla- nation. The changes were needed for the convenience of admin- istration, so state water offi- cials excluded three more rights holders, and put back in one of two ranchers with exclusive rights'to Hungry Creek water, and the only ones to store water in Taylor Lake -- the Heart K. Mendenhall insists changes like these are only made when : the rights holders are involved i somehow. " Maybe they asked to be excluded, he explained, and ! maybe officials agreed after investigating the situation. The decrees, the water- master service area history and other official documents pertaining to water rights in the Indian Creek watershed are available online at water.ca.gov/watermaster. Once there, click on Service Areas in the gray box that lists northern region items, then on Indian Creek. E INSTANT SAVINGS $ Up TO PASSENGER CAR TIRES WHEN YOU PURCHASE A SET OF 4 SELECT TIRES NO hassles, NO mailing, NO waiting! JUST... INSTANT SAVINGS! (SEE STORE FOR DETAILS) LIGHT TRUCK & SUV TIRES BMOOlrH,  PASSENGER CAR CUSTOM WHEELS Ill Jl • ""' IlaNline l|B : Gloss Black Ameriran Ib IIS : wUh Minor Cut Lip 15x7 Machined & Sliver 14x6 UGHT TRUCK G SUV CUSTOM VVHEEL8 liMC-BB 800: Matte Black 17xl ""' stadlml At  At 15Te IIItm 1114 grgt : Slmm Black & MecMned 15](8 f/SUSANtlILLE00 I OUlNCY ] 2385 Main St. / 116 East Main St. 257-8883 t) 283-1450 OFFER GOOD THROUGH SEPTEMBER 31, 2011 1 BASE