Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Indian Valley Record
Greenville, California
July 6, 2011     Indian Valley Record
PAGE 19     (19 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 19     (19 of 32 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
July 6, 2011
 
Newspaper Archive of Indian Valley Record produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




Bulletin, Progressive, Record, Reporter Wednesday, July 6, 2011 9B COMMUNITY PERSPE CTIVE Californians celebrate fieedom from higher taxes WHERE I STAND nearly doubling the state's al- ............................................................................................................. ready high vehicle license STATE SENATOR TED GAINES fee, and lowering the depen- As Californians celebrated our nation's independence and the freedom that we all cherish, we also celebrated another gift of freedom over the holiday weekend -- taxes went down. Gov. Brown at least temporarily abandoned his crusade for increased taxes and agreed to a budget that, while far from perfect, respects the hard-working families of our state. Two years ago, despite my loud objections, the Legisla- ture crafted a budget deal that attacked taxpayers from every side, raising the sales and personal income taxes, dent credit allowed on state income taxes. These increas- es were to expire after two years unless the voters agreed to extend them in a special election. In May 2009, when voters had the opportunity to weigh in with their opinions, every single county -- even the vastly left-leaning Bay Area counties -- said "no," send- ing what should have been a clear signal to every Califor- nia politician and pundit. With that overwhelming electoral loss still close in the rearview mirror and unem- ployment running close to 12 percent, it's unfathomable that anyone would think that extending the higher taxes is an acceptable answer to the state's budget crisis. Unfortu- nately, the governor and legislative Democrats offered the same unimaginative solution they offer to every challenge faced by the state -- more taxes. In this case, $58 billion more in taxes over five years. I did not support the initial tax increase and I did not support any budget proposal that depended on tax exten- sions. With the remaining tax extensions that expired July 1, we will start to undo some of the damage done to families and employers over the past two years. The dependent tax credit returned to $309 per child, up from the punitive $99 of the past two years. The state sales tax went down 1 percent. The vehicle license fee dropped from 1.15 percent of a car's value to 0.65 percent. The personal income tax increase had already temporarily expired after two tax cycles. All told, this reduction in tax rates will save California taxpayers almost $6 billion a year or approximately $1200 per family. Lower taxes are expected to stimulate consumer demand for big-ticket items such as automobiles, which, in turn, ,will help businesses profit and expand in our state. If California is ever to escape the budget crisis cycle, we will not do it through higher taxes. We will not do it by making it harder to raise a family in our state or by making it more difficult to start and run a business. We will only grow our way out of our problems. And as Winston Churchill once said, trying to tax your way to prosperity is like standing in a bucket and trying to lift yourself up by the handle. It is self-defeating. We should celebrate this victory, but it's not a time to rest. California's tax picture began to improve a little July 1, but we are improving on what is still the 49th worst tax climate in the country. We still have work to do if we are going to provide the incentives for entrepreneurs to start their businesses here and create private sector jobs. I am going to continue to push for lower taxes and simpler, less burdensome regulations to let employers know that California is open for business. I hope you were able to enjoy the Independence Day weekend, and enjoy the fact that for once, California taxes are heading in the right direction. Senator Ted Gaines represents the 1st Senate District, which in- cludes all or parts of Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, El Dorado, Lassen, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plurnas, Sacramento and Sierra counties. LETTERS to the EDITOR Guidelines for Letters All letters must contain an address and a phone number. We publish only one letter per week, per person and only one letter per person, per month regarding the same subject. We do not publish third-party, anonymous, or open letters. Letters must be limited to a maximum of 300 words. The editor will cut any letter in excess of 300 words. The deadline is Friday at 3 p.m. (Deadlines may change due to holidays.) Letters may be taken to any of Feather Publishing's offices, sent via fax to 283-3952, or e-mailed to mail@plumasnews.com. Clarifications We at FRC appreciate your reporting on the cost overruns of our library construction project. Overall, the reporting has been thorough and fair. Given the complexity, however, a few misstatements were bound to creep in. I offer a couple of clarifications. "Although the college thought it would save money by acting as its own general contractor, the move left it responsible for other costs." Actually, the cost overruns had no direct connection with the college acting as general contractor. The multi- prime arrangement simply opened us up to greater potential for inappropriate bids -- which have indeed increased costs. "There was no separate project accounting beyond (Facilities Director Nick) Boyd's updates." Actually, the facilities department kept a separate spreadsheet on the project, and reconciled figures monthly with what was in the college's general ledger. Moreover, the state reimbursement requests re- quired monthly comparisons of ongoing costs with the state allocation for each portion of the project. What did not occur was formal monthly financial reports to the trustees, as noted. We have corrected this for the future. • "Delay in discovering the overruns did not allow trustees an opportunity to find savings elsewhere in the project." As the article noted, we did forego nonessential features, such as landscaping (actually, we have stopped all nonessentials). The state- ment implies, however, that if the overruns had been dis- covered earlier, there would have been other choices, and this is not the case. If we had been aware over a year ago that the overruns would be so large, the district could have stopped the pro- ject, leaving a foundation and no building. That would have been the only realistic choice. Moreover, the state- ment conflates the account- ing error that obscured the size of the overruns, with the discovery of the overruns generally. The accounting er- ror only obscured a portion of the overruns, not the fact that there were overruns. We knew much earlier that there was going to be an overage, and we were discussing this. Ultimately, the accounting error, and any lapses in com- munication or understand- ing, did not cause the cost overruns. The costs were what they were, and would only have been avoided by not finishing the building, or by selecting different contractors in the first place and discovering different soils conditions (and other, similar details of construc- tion as noted). It is also worth pointing out that the FRCCD trustees and their administration were responsible stewards of the public's money on this project. The fact that there has been a significant overage should not obscure the fact that there have been no inappropriate expenses, and that every viable ingle to keep costs down has been pursued. Again, I want to thank you for your responsible coverage of college issues. Ron Taylor SuperintendentPresident Feather River College 'Civfllty' Dirty, rotten, no good #@*! Whatever happened to civility? You remember- when we read our history, knew our subject and debated the pros and cons with confidence and actual facts. When we had intelligent and informed exchanges of ideas and opinions. Today's exchanges are like an argument on the play- ground -- did the runner touch base? "Did, too! .... Did not!" Did, too! .... Did not!" Whoever shouts the loudest wins. Really? We've lost civility in our discourse: being polite and courteous, respectful and considerate, gracious and willing to discuss. News is presented in sound bites meant to incite discord. TV moderators give three guests 15 seconds to answer a complicated question and they end up talking over each other, interrupting others to make their point. Magazines and users of the Internet use vitriol and raw language to instigate dissension and hostility. Name calling has become an art. Add to that people making assumptions because they don't understand their subject, and you've got the recipe for more anger and fear mongering. Where does it end? Actually, with each of us. My morn always said, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all." Not that everything you said had to please everyone. She meant that whatever you had to say could be said with civility -- firmly and passionately certainly, but not destructive. So. Do we continue to yell hate-filled epithets, call people names when we don't even know them, shout the loudest to prove we're "right," use sarcasm to berate others, try to goad each other into uncivil behavior? Or do we learn the facts, know our subject, form an in- telligent opinion, and express our views with good manners and respect for others? Which approach are you teaching your children and on what path will that lead them? Lynn Desjardin Portola Corrected To my learned friends Dr. Heaney, Andy Johnson, I suggest that you both continue your study of the Constitution. You are correct that I wrote "or the pursuit of happiness." I intended to write "or prop- erty." I was thinking about one item and writing about another knowing they were indeed terms used in our Constitution and not in the "Preamble to the Constitu- tion." In my zeal to express a point I used "The Preamble to the Constitution." I did so innocently. So that you understand, I must correct your error, gentlemen. You both men- tioned that "Life .... Liberty" do not appear in the Pre- amble (true) or the Constitu- tion 'anywhere." The Fifth Amendment and 14th Amend- ment to the United States Constitution declare that governments cannot deprive any person of "life, liberty, or property" without due process of law. Those terms are indeed in our Constitu- tion. Thanks for being aware, getting it corrected and teaching others. Dr. Trent Saxton Lake Davis Lead by example In his recent "diatribe" Dr. Trent Saxton seems to call for the division of the United States into red and blue states. Even a moment's thought shows just how ridiculous his ideas are. Imagine upwards of 100 mil- lion Americans on the move from red to blue and blue to red. Perhaps the good doctor envisions a gigantic govern- ment database that would match reds in blue states with blues in red states so they could just swap their homes and jobs and call it even. How many people does he think would go for that? I blieve a better alternative would be to learn to live together civilly and to re- solve our differences without resorting to diatribes, innu- endo, half truths and name calling. If he believes what he says and practices what he preaches, perhaps Dr. Saxton will tell those of us staying behind when he's going to pack up his "hard earned" belongings and lead his "rather extensive, like- minded fan club" out of the wilderness of true blue California and into the promised land of a red state like Alabama or Arkansas. After all, real leaders lead by examPle. My own guess is that The Rapture will have come and gone long before Dr. Saxton and his band of disciples ever get to Border- town. But then, one can always hope. Bob Kimberling Portola Alumni give back First of all congratulations to the two Chester High School seniors who received the $400 scholarships, Claire Bryant and Kalynn Sherod. I wish we could have given all graduates a $400 scholarship. I am somewhat saddened that it was never mentioned that D0nnie Miller (class of '57) gave back $250 of his $500 winnings to the scholarship fund. Furthermore, Lorena Lowe (Freemyers) (class of '56) did an awful lot of work behind the scenes. Lorena, being the wonderful person that she is and always has been, does not consider it work. Last, but not least, while everybody was enjoying a refreshment of their choice, the wonderful and capable secretary of Chester High School, Cheryl Henry, whom I recruited to help me, she had no choice, worked hard to make up more tickets for the scholarship fund drawing. It's a shame how quickly we forget when we get old. The good Lord willing, see you in 2013. Semper Fi. Guenther Griebau Class of '56 San Bernardino Eliminate CAO I agree with last week's editorial. It would be a shame to cut all furtding for Plumas Arts and the Plumas County Visitors Bureau. It may save money in the near future, but in the long run, will hurt our county coffers. It was not so long ago, just a few years actually, that the Board af Supervisors managed Plumas County business by relying on the department heads, both appointed and elected. There was no need for a county administrative officer (CAO). If the BOS wished to save $279,000 a year, they should consider eliminating this office/position, and return to managing the county as be- fore. Too many county offices are understaffed and our services are suffering. The CAO's duties could be done by the Board of Supervisors. That's why we elected our supervisors, to manage the county's business. This action should be seriously considered. Michael Beatley Meadow Valley For the love of a town I was fortunate to have grown up in Quincy. My childhood was glorious. Like many, I left soon after gradu- ating from high school. Twenty-five years later I was homesick and started making more regular visits to Quincy. For a few days at a time I could forget that I had ever left. Lately it has been increas- ingly painful for me to visit. I see the changes that have taken place. There are so many empty storefronts, few people and children on the streets, or at the creek. Where are the children of Quincy? I began to wonder about the children of Quincy. I thought of all of the children and families I grew up with and the many who have moved on. I wojadered what they would think, if they could see what I was seeing. Would their hearts break as mine was breaking? Would they care? Hoping to inspire folks to return to Quincy to enjoy its beauty and support the struggling economy, I started a Facebook group of former and current Quincy people. The response of the group has been an outpouring of positive energy and willing- ness to help. People have set aside their differences and united on a solid common ground -- their love of a town. I have been inspired to make every purchase I can in Quincy, and I pledge to organize future town reunion events and volunteer work- days. I can only begin to imagine what might be possible if everyone got in- volved and did just a little to help. Remember that generosity is measured not by how much you give, but by how much of what you have you choose to give. No gesture is too small to be in- significant or unappreciated. Together we can make a difference. Deb Hopkins San Francisco Handout or helping hand? Local investment is the best way to sustain our local businesses and rebuild our local economy. Businesses are closing to cut their losses, or relocating for greener pas- tures. The state of California, its counties and cities need reformation. The city of Portola has the potential to provide a greener pasture for businesses if its city council would get its head out of the manure and take the first steps to think like entrepreneurs. They need to cut the cost of operations and work on the community's vision. They need to reform their municipal code. Eastern Plumas Health Care is essential for commu- nity and economic develop- ment. Their CEO asked the city for help by asking the city to consider buying property for less than half of what they paid. It is a golden opportunity for a win-win deal for both our hospital and our city. The 35-acre parcel was zoned light industrial. The first overall land use goal in the city's general plan is the following: "Pro- vide land uses that expand employment, education, recreation and cultural opportunities for residents. Reinforce Portola as the com- mercial and service center for eastern Plumas County." The city has expanded recreation and cultural opportunities for residents but has failed miserably in its other goals for community and economic development. EPHC is asking for reinforce- ment as our medical service center and a major employer in eastern Plumas County. They are not looking .for a handout, just a helping hand. Community and economic development within the city limits must become the primary goal of our elected officials. Community devel- opment grant funds should be sought for more than just our streetscape project. It is a good first step for economic recovery. Community leaders and citizens are getting involved in the operations and management of water and sewer services on the ad hoc committee. It is another good first step. Larry F. Douglas Portola Contact your elected officials... PLUMAS COUNTY SUPERVISORS - 520 Main Street, Room 309, Quinc; !CA 95971; (530) 283-6170; FAX: (530) 283-6288; E-Mail: pcbs@countyofplumas.com. Individual supervisors can also be e-mailed from links on the county website, countyofplumas.com PRESIDENT - Barack Obama, the White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20500. (202) 456-1414. Fax: 202456-2461. E-maih whitehouse.gov/contact/ U.S. SENATOR - Dianne Feinstein (D), 331 Hart Senate Office Bldg., Washington, D.C. 20510. (202) 224-3841; FAX: 202-228-3954; TFY/TDD: (202) 224-2501. District Office: One Post Street, Suite 2450, San Francisco, CA 94104; Phone: (415) 393-0707; Fax: (415) 393-0710 Website: feinstein.senate.gov. U.S. SENATOR - Barbara Boxer D). District Office: 501 I St., Suite 7-600, Sacramento, CA 95814. (916) 448-2787; FAX (916) 448-2563; OR 112 Hart Bldg., Washington, D.C. 20510. (202) 224-3553. FAX (202) 228-0454. U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, 4TH DIST. - Tom McClintock. 508 CannonHOB, Washington, D.C. 20515. (202) 225-2511; FAX (202) 225-5444. mcclintock.house.gov. DISTRICT OFFICE: 8700 Auburn Folson Rd., Suite #100, Granite Bay, CA 95746; (916) 786-5560, FAX: (916) 786-6364. STATE SENATOR, 1st DIST. - Ted Gaines. State Capitol, Room 3056, Sacramento, CA 95814. (916) 651-4001, FAX: (916) 324-2680. Roseville office: 2140 Professional Dr., #140, Roseville, CA, 95661. (916) 783-8232, FAX (916) 783-5487; Jackson office: 33 C Broadwa) Jackson, CA 95642, (209) 22,3-9140. STATE ASSEMBLYMAN, 3RD DIST. - Dan Logue, State Capitol, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 319-2003; FAX (916) 319-2103. District Office, 1550 Humboldt Rd., Ste. #4, Chico, CA 95928; (530) 895-4217, FAX (530) 895-4219. GOVERNOR Jerry Brown, office of the Governor, Capitol, Suite 1173, Sacramento, CA 95814. Website: gov.ca.gov/ (916) 445-2841. FAX: (916) 558-3160. State