Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_REFERER in /home/stparch/public_html/headmid_temp_main.php on line 4394
Newspaper Archive of
Indian Valley Record
Greenville, California
May 25, 2011     Indian Valley Record
PAGE 19     (19 of 34 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
 
PAGE 19     (19 of 34 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Jumbo Image    Save To Scrapbook    Set Notifiers    PDF    JPG
May 25, 2011
 
Newspaper Archive of Indian Valley Record produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2025. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information
Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Request Content Removal | About / FAQ | Get Acrobat Reader




Bulletin, Progressive, Record, Reporter Wednesday, March 251 2011 9B COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE California's .Legislature WHERE I STAND JOHN KABATECK CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS If this year is any indication, the news is not good for small businesses and their employ- ees. And it's not because of the troubled economy, recession or any other external source. Well, check that, there is an external source that consis- tently, year after year, inflicts pain and hardship on small businesses. Cue scary, dramatic music here... The California Legis- lature. Some may assert that it is an overgeneralization to say that the entire Legislature has it out for small business- es in the state. But consider for a moment the results of the NFIB/CA 2010 voting record. When 50 assembly members and over 2O sena- tors have voting records of 50 percent or less on the issues that matter most to our mem- bers -- something just isn't getting through those Capitol doors. Let me pause here for a mo- ment to address those elected members of the Legislature that have stellar voting records with NFIB -- by that, I mean 80 percent or higher (at last count there were 36 in the Assembly and 17 in the Senate). NFIB sincerely ap- plauds you for standing with us... and honestly, you are not the problem here. Your hands continue to be tied by the lack of understanding your colleagues have about small business. Now back to the current Main Street menace... Nowhere is this lack of support more apparent than in the bills that are allowed to pass and those that never see the light of day. Take for example the rash of bills that would have reformed the tax system fo: small business, or eased wage and hour con- straints. Most, if not all, of those pieces of legislation are dead on arrival. Gone. Never to be seen again until the next session. On the flip side, the following bills that would harm California businesses are making their way through the Legislature with few, if any, bumps in the road: Senate Bill 104 (Steinberg) would undermine the process that now guarantees, through secret-ballot elections, a fair vote and the expression of - A Main Street menace? agricultural employees' true sentiments on the selection of a collective bargaining repre- sentative. It should be noted that unions were started in California and the nation (with help from Gov: Brown and Cesar Chavez) with the secret ballot process as a sa- cred cornerstone. Yet, as la- bor has witnessed their num- bers and popularity decrease in recent years, they are making any attempt to force unionization -- through em- ployee intimidation -- in the workplace. Senate Bill 129 (Leno) pro- hibits employers from taking necessary steps to maintain a safe workplace by precluding them from enforcing a com- prehensive drug-free employ- ment policy. Translation here -- your employees can come to work high and there's nothing you can do about it! Puts employees in harm's way, forces employers to choose between violating either state or federal drug- free workplace policy, and gives small businesses one more reason not to do busi- ness in California. SB 653 (Steinberg) gives counties authority to impose new personal income, car, gas and energy taxes -- atop what Californians are already pay- ing at the state level. Throws another heaping pile of new taxes on small businesses and taxpayers already deep in the hole, and is taxation without represen- tation -- forces non-residents to pay new taxes in counties they do business with with- out any opportunity to vote on those taxes. Senate Bill 746 (Lieu) would ban anyone under 18 from using an ultraviolet tanning device -- though not from tanning under the sun. What's next, a ban on car sunroofs so we don't acciden- tally catch some rays? These tanning facilities are already sufficiently regulated by the Department of Consumer Affairs. Just another classic example of Nanny Govern- ment. It's going to be a long summer, folks. Assembly Bill 10 (Alejo) increases the minimum wage from $8 to $8.50 and indexes it to inflation. Like paid sick leave, another proposal that will have the opposite effect on those Californians it aims to help: the working class. Where do they expect small employers to come up with this new and unanticipated expense? There'snothing left in the till. Assembly Bill 400 (Ma) mandates that all employers, except those with collective bargaining agreements, pro- vide any employee who has worked in California for seven days with paid sick leave, the accrual rate at one hour for every 30 hours worked. Yet another new mandate on small employers. NFIB sur- veys repeatedly show that 96 percent of all small employers have already developed a com- prehensive leave program with their employees that is functioning well. Law of unin- tended consequences -- will actually hurt those it intends to help the most: entry-level working Californians. At the end of the day, all small business owners want is to be able to create jobs, grow their businesses and support their communities. They can't do that when bad policies are allowed to sail through and commonsense policies die a painful death every time. At our annual Day at the Capitol event last month, many expressed frustration and outrage at our elected leaders. They demanded an explanation-- and they deserve one. As one member who owns a single restaurant in Sacra- mento exclaimed, "Our government seems to do everything they can to fight developing the tax base." • Small businesses, not govern- ment, are the wealth and job creators -- and feed our economy -- yet our elected officials portray them as the enemy. Now is the time for those who claim to support small businesses to actually do so with the most powerful thing they have -- their votes on legislation that comes before them. They can begin by re- jecting bad bills that increase the cost of doing business, add more to the regulatory burden and give the trial lawyer lobby more power to sue vulnerable job creators -- and passing good policy that will help scared, uncer- tain "morn and pop" owners and their employees crawl out of the deep hole they're in. NFIB and California's small business owners are watching to see what those who profess to support small business will do ... and we are ready to hold those who don't walk the walk and talk the talk fully accountable. LETTERS to the EDITOR Guidelines for Letters All letters must contain an ad- dress and a phone number. We publish only one letter per week, per person and only one letter per person, per month regarding the same subject. We do not publish third-party, anonymous, or open letters. Letters must be limited to a maximum of 300 words. The editor will cut any letter in excess of 300 words. The deadline is Friday at 3 p.m. (Deadlines may change due to holidays.) Letters may be taken to any of Feather Publishing's offices, sent via fax to 283-3952, or e-mailed to mail@plumasnews.com. Serious issues As a friend of a Seneca Hos- pital employee, I was pleased to finally see more than just public relations fluff printed about the administration. There are some very serious issues which Ms. Burnett has brought to public attention, and I want to thank her for her courage in doing so. As she stated, she is a for- mer employee. No current employee would ever address such concerns in a public fo- rum for fear of being targeted for retaliation. Even employ- ees who have addressed such concerns in a private meet- ing have suffered the conse- quences of speaking out against the administration of Seneca hospital. And, once again Mr. Self cannot comment because it has to be "reviewed by' the district's attorney." That is his standard way of avoiding commenting on anything he is confronted with that may be perceived as negative. As a community you need to be involved and ask ques- tions. You all need to fear for the future of Seneca hospital under this current adminis- tration. I encourage everyone to attend the board of direc- tors meetings, ask questions, demand answers. Seneca hospital is one of the largest employers in Chester, and probably has the largest number of unhappy or disgruntled employees of any employer in Chester. This is directly due to the current administration. What if all these people decided they just couldn't take it any more? You would not have a hospital. John W. Roberts Chico Shameful oversight I am writing to express my concern with the "tempo- rary" closure of the Plumas County Law Library. Around eight months ago I called the law library to ask library staff a question. When I couldn't get anyone on the phone I called around to court departments and learned that the law library was "temporarily" closed. Eight months later the library is still closed, with no explanation. What is the reason behind the library's closure? Background: County law libraries were established in California law in 1891 (Busi- ness and Professions Code). According to this law, county law libraries are funded with a small portion of local Superior Court filing fees in order to provide county resi- dents with free access to legal information (CA B&P 6360). The Plumas County Law Library should still be receiv- ing $23 per court filing (B&P 6321), yet the doors to the law library remain closed. Where is the law library's designated funding going if it isn't being used to keep the library open to the public? We are living in the worst economy since the Great Depression, and many people cannot afford to hire an attor- ney. Since rural communities do not have nearly as many legal aid resources as large cities, county law libraries are sometimes the only "show in town" when it comes to (freely) helping people with their important legal issues. I urge residents of Plumas County to ask about the status of their county law library by contacting the law library trustees, court or county officials. Closing the Plumas County Law Library, despite having funding for it, isn't just a shame- it is an oversight that compromises the ability of the county to provide its residents with equal access to the California judicial system. Vanessa Uribe Law Librarian E1 Dorado County Royal treatment A quick review of the current Portola city budget (available on the city web- site) reveals that among the city employee benefits are health insurance costs of $25,200/year ($2,100[mortth) for each of Six employees and $18,792/year ($1,566/ month) for each of four other employees. One assumes the difference is a matter of dependent coverage. With a published Portola median household income of $29,430 (source: muninetguide.com) and an assumption that each household consists of two people, either health insur- ance cost exceeds the Portola median per capita annual income. It is easy to envision a visit of one of these fortunate cry employees to a medical facili- ty in which the facility staff rushes out to lay down a red carpet for the employee's entrance. If this is not the case, we can be certain that when the insurance salesman who packaged the deal leaves his mansion to walk among the commoners, he marches on the plushest of red carpets. It is comforting to know that we Portola taxpayers, through our financially This week at plumasnews.com The most read stories on our website for the past week were: "Fishing Report: Lake fishing keeps getting better" "Quincy goes crazy for quilts" "EQSD board votes to end consolidatio n process" The story "Was Bible distribution on school grounds?" received the most comments: "What ever, in the world, is wrong with the handing out of the Bible and in the manner that it was done? "Most recreational miners are in fact very environmentally conscious, and would no sooner poison the fish than them- selves. In fact, many would likely go fishing for their dinner and camp nearby. Miners often bring home more trash than gold, trash discarded by other recreational uses of the land." --Allan mThank you Delaine Fragnoli for writing a fair and responsible piece. 1 am a disabled OIF Vet and have been prospecting all my life. Due to my injuries the only way I can prospect anymore is the use of a suction dredge. "Is there a copy of a Bible in the school library? The principals actions are way out of line, over nothing.  --Bill Kauffman "Thank you and the Plumas County Supervisors for giving us a fair shake.  --Mason Just curious if your reaction would be the same if it had been the Koran that has handed out?  --Michael "Nice to hear a smart reaction to dredging moratorium. My family goes dredging for recreation every summer. We con- tribute lots of money in the local areas we go to. Had a response regarding my comment, asking if I would think the same, if the Koran was being handed out. Yes, it would. Anyone offered either or any publication, can always say "No Thank you.' --Bill Kauffman Unless the Bibles were handed out by school employees dur- ing school time, there is nothing to complain about." --Ingineer66 "County pans DFG's dredge study" also elicited several responses: "California history is the gold prospectors!!!  --susan One reader left a plea for help in response to "Plumas-Eureka on state park closure list": "1 would like to start a letter writing campaign but need help in knowing what should be included. My family has been going to Plumas for over 48years. It is a family tradition.  --Trudi OConnell disinterested city council, are providing royal treatment for someone. Bill Mainland Portola Counterproductive Steve Brenneman had a good tutorial going on the ba- sic meaning of the legal term "proper standing" and Ari- zona Christian School Tu- ition Organization'v. Winn, until he made this assertion 'about the minority dissent: ,,(i)n other words, any m0fiey you earn belongs to the gov- ernment." I can't speak for the justices writing for the minority but I'm certain that the principle at stake with the $500 tax credit was that any money you owe the gov- ernment, accordingto tax law, belongs to the govern- ment. I know that government- bashing is all the rage these days and, lord knows, there are plenty of legitimate, truthful reasons to criticize: local, state or federal. But it seems counterproductive to be hysterical about it. Steve Shepherd Clio Not surprised I am not at all surprised that President Obama's de- tractors would find fault with another of his accomplish- ments at which George Bush failed. Immediately, the Obama detractors became skeptical and wanted to see Bin Laden's body. I am sure there was a good reason for the dis- posal of the body as soon as possible; although, I must ad- mit, upon reading that Bin Laden was buried at sea, I knew it would open the door for skepticism. I am convinced, however, that putting a quick end to the saga of Bin Laden is best for America and the world. It would have served no pur- pose to put Bin Laden's body and the pictures of his dernise On display: .... Bush did not squander a tril- lion dollars, as one writer would have us believe, just to see pictures of Bin Laden's demise. Ostensibly, Bush bankrupted our nation to make our country safer, al- though how the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan was to h.ave accomplished that has al- ways been a mystery. Neither nation had been a.threat to America. Bush invaded those countries without provocation. The relatively inexpensive dispatching of the lion in his den by the Obama team, however, has put an end to the real very charismatic, resourceful and powerful enemy who was doing his best to destroy us. In any case, now the tea people can put the outra- geous claims of socialism, secularism and Obama's birth on the back burner for a while. They have some- thing else to obsess about. Salvatore Catalano Taylorsville Contact your elected officials... PLUMAS COtrNTY SUPERVISORS - 520 Main Street, Room 309, Quincy, CA 95971; (530) 283-6170; FAX: (530) 2&3-6288; E-Mail: pcbs@countyofplumas.com. Individual supervisors can also be e-mailed from links on the county website, countyofplumas.com PRESIDENT - Barack Obama, the White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20500. (202) 456-1414. Fax: 202456-2461. E-mail: whitehouse.gov/contact / U.S. SENATOR - Dianne Feinstein (D), 331 Hart Senate Office Bldg. Washington, D.C. 20510. (202) 224-3841; FAX: 202-228-3954; TIT/TDI. (202) 224-2501. District Office:. One Post Street, Suite 2450, San Francisco, CA 94104 i Phone: (415) 393-0707; Fax: (415) 393-0710 Website: feinstein.senate.gov. U.S. SENATOR - Barbara Boxer (D). District Office: 501 1 St., Suite 7-600 Sacramento, CA 95814. 1916) 448-2787; FAX (916) 448-2563; OR 112 Har Bldg., Washington, D.C. 20510. (202) 224-3553. FAX (202) 228-0454. U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, 4TH DIST. - Tom McClintock. 508 Cannon HOB Washington, D.C. 20515. (202) 225-2511; FAX (202) 225-5444. mcclintock.house.gov. DISTRICT OFFICE: 8700 Auburn Folson Rd., Suih #100, Granite Bay, CA 95746; (916) 786-5560, FAX: (916) 786-6364. STATE SENATOR, 1st DIST. - Ted Gaines. State Capitol, Room 3056 Sacramento, CA 95814. (916) 651-4001, FAX: (916) 324-2680. Roseville office: 2140 Professional Dr., #140, Roseville, CA, 95661. (916) 783-8232, FAX (916) 783-5487; Jackson office: 33 C Broadway, Jackson, CA 95642, (209) 223-9140. STATE ASSEMBLYMAN, 3RD DIST. - Dan Logue, State Capitol, Sacramento, CA95814, (916) 319-2003; FAX (916) 319-2103. District Office, 1550 Humboldt Rd., Ste. #4, Chico, CA 95928; (530) 8954217, FAX (530) 895-4219. GOVERNOR Jerry Brown, office of the Governor, State Capitol, Suite 1173, Sacramento, CA 95814. Website: gov.ca.gov/ (916) 445-2841. FAX: (916) 558-3160.